An unusually clear warning is currently causing a stir in the world of open source software. The developers of LibreOffice publicly advise against it, Apache OpenOffice to use. This clear statement is remarkable in the otherwise rather reserved open source community.
The reason for this warning are serious Security gapsthat have existed in the software for years and have not been fixed. According to a recently published protocol of the Apache Software Foundation (ASF), there are at least three serious vulnerabilities in OpenOffice. Vulnerabilitiesthat are older than one year.
This information was confirmed by a representative of the ASF security team upon request. It is particularly problematic that many users continue to use the software despite these known risks, which poses considerable dangers for the IT Security entails.
The Office solution, once considered a pioneer, has lost development momentum in recent years, while competing projects have been continuously improved. In this article, we shed light on the background to this warning, explain the specific risks and provide recommendations for affected users.
Important findings
- LibreOffice developers officially warn against the use of Apache OpenOffice
- At least three critical security vulnerabilities have existed for over a year
- The Apache Software Foundation has confirmed the existence of this Vulnerabilities confirmed
- Despite known risks, OpenOffice continues to be used by many users
- Alternative Office solutions offer better protection against current threats
Introduction to the problem of security vulnerabilities
In the world of office software, invisible dangers often lurk in the form of security vulnerabilities, which are a particular problem with outdated programs such as OpenOffice. Digital security is now more of a focus than ever, as increasingly sophisticated attack methods are being developed. Of particular concern is the recent discovery of a dangerous vulnerability that threatens users of OpenOffice and older versions of LibreOffice.
What are security vulnerabilities?
Security gaps, also known as Vulnerabilities are errors or defects in the programming of software that can be exploited by attackers. These errors allow hackers to gain unauthorized access to systems or introduce malicious code.
In the specific case of OpenOffice, Alex Inführ, an employee of the security company Cure53, discovered a critical vulnerability. By cleverly exploiting the script functionality, he was able to execute malicious code from a seemingly harmless OpenDocument text file.
"The discovered vulnerability in OpenOffice is particularly insidious, as it can be activated when opening seemingly normal documents without the user noticing."
Such Security risks can occur in various forms. They range from simple programming errors to complex design weaknesses that are only discovered years later. Zero-day vulnerabilities are particularly problematic - Vulnerabilitieswhich are already exploited by attackers before they are known to the developers.
Why are they particularly risky?
The risk of security vulnerabilities in Office applications is particularly high, as these programs work with sensitive documents on a daily basis. Companies and private individuals entrust these applications with their most important data - from financial reports to personal information.
A successful attack via a vulnerability in OpenOffice can have serious consequences. These include:
- Theft of confidential data and business secrets
- Encryption of important files by ransomware
- Installation of spyware on the system
- Complete takeover of the computer by attackers
The situation becomes particularly problematic if known vulnerabilities are not fixed by updates over a longer period of time. This is precisely the case with OpenOffice, where patch management is significantly slower than with the more active LibreOffice community.
| Type of vulnerability | Risk potential | Typical attack method | Frequency for Office software |
|---|---|---|---|
| Script execution | Very high | Prepared documents with hidden code | Frequently |
| Buffer overflow | High | Overwriting memory areas | Medium |
| XML injection | Medium | Manipulation of XML structures | Frequently with older versions |
| Macro vulnerabilities | Very high | Automated scripts in documents | Very common |
The vulnerability discovered by Alex Inführ is particularly dangerous because it can be exploited without any special user interaction. All an attacker has to do is trick the victim into opening a prepared document - for example by sending an email attachment or downloading it from a manipulated website.
While LibreOffice reacts quickly to such discoveries and provides security updates, OpenOffice often remains vulnerable for longer. This significantly increases the risk for users, as hackers specifically search for known but unpatched vulnerabilities. Vulnerabilities search.
LibreOffice compared to OpenOffice
The shared past of LibreOffice and OpenOffice conceals profound development differences that are particularly relevant for security-conscious users. OpenOffice, which emerged from the source code of StarOffice in 2000, has had a turbulent history. After the takeover of Sun Microsystems by Oracle, uncertainties arose about the future of the software. This led to the founding of the Document Foundation and the spin-off of LibreOffice in 2010. The following year, OpenOffice was handed over to the Apache Software Foundation, where it continues to be run as a top-level project.
Differences between the programs
Although both programs are based on the same code base, they have developed in different directions since the separation in 2010. The most noticeable difference lies in the speed of development. LibreOffice benefits from a extremely active communitywhich regularly implements new functions and improves existing ones.
OpenOffice, on the other hand, is developing at a much slower pace. The current version 4.1.15 from December 2023 only brought a few bug fixes and dictionary updates. It is worth noting that the last major functional enhancement with version 4.1 was back in April 2014 - almost a decade ago.
Another significant difference concerns the file formats. LibreOffice uses the open ODF format (Open Document Format) as standard, but also offers excellent compatibility with Microsoft Office formats. Although OpenOffice also supports ODF, it often has formatting problems with more complex Microsoft documents.
The user interface of both programs is fundamentally similar, although LibreOffice has introduced more modern elements in recent years. These include a revised ribbon, improved toolbars and an overall fresher look.
Strengths and weaknesses of LibreOffice
The greatest strength of LibreOffice undoubtedly lies in the area of Security updates. The Document Foundation reacts quickly to discovered vulnerabilities and regularly publishes patches. This speed of response is particularly important as Office applications are a popular target for cyber attacks due to their widespread use.
Another advantage is the continuous further development. LibreOffice receives updates with new functions and improvements approximately every one to two months. This not only ensures greater security, but also better compatibility with modern operating systems and file formats.
One of the weaknesses of LibreOffice is its slightly higher resource consumption compared to OpenOffice. This can lead to performance losses on older systems. In addition, the wealth of functions can initially seem overwhelming for occasional users.
| Feature | LibreOffice | OpenOffice | Significance for users |
|---|---|---|---|
| Update frequency | Every 1-2 months | Rarely (often annually) | Greater security with LibreOffice |
| Developer community | Very active | Less active | Faster troubleshooting for LibreOffice |
| MS Office compatibility | Good to very good | Moderate | Better data exchange with LibreOffice |
| Resource consumption | Moderate | Lower | OpenOffice advantageous for older hardware |
| Additional functions | Extensive | Basic | More possibilities with LibreOffice |
The decision between the two Open source office software-solutions should not only be based on functionality, but also take security aspects into account. The active development and regular Software updates make LibreOffice the more secure choice for everyday use in private and business environments.
Especially in companies where data security is a top priority, the advantages of LibreOffice far outweigh the minor disadvantages. With its transparent security policy and rapid response to threats, the Document Foundation has set a standard that OpenOffice cannot currently match.
Common security vulnerabilities in OpenOffice
In the course of its development, OpenOffice has experienced several serious security problems that have not yet been fully resolved. These vulnerabilities make the software susceptible to various types of hacker attacks and significantly increase the risk for users. Particularly problematic is the slow response time in fixing known security vulnerabilities, which gives attackers a larger window of opportunity for their activities.
Historical security incidents
The history of OpenOffice is characterized by several serious security incidents. One particularly critical case occurred in 2016 when a dangerous memory corruption vulnerability was discovered. This vulnerability allowed attackers to manipulate memory and potentially cause execute malicious code.
The worrying thing about this incident was the reaction of the Apache developers. Instead of providing a security update, they simply published information about the vulnerability. As a solution, they recommended that anti-virus programs should use a special signature to detect possible attacks - a measure that many security experts criticized as inadequate.
This case illustrates a fundamental problem: while LibreOffice regularly releases security updates, new versions of OpenOffice only appear at long intervals. This delayed reaction to security problems significantly increases the risk for all users of the software.
Current threats
Current threats include a particularly dangerous directory traversal vulnerability. This vulnerability affects the document format used by both Office suites, which has a function for executing scripts. Actually, only scripts from a specific directory should be executable, but this security measure can be easily circumvented.
An attacker can create a special path of the form ../../../../../../[path] outwit the security mechanisms and execute scripts from arbitrary directories. This method is frighteningly simple and opens the door to various types of Malware.
Particularly worrying is an attack scenario in which victims are tricked into downloading a Python file. An attacker could then execute this file in the user's download directory and thus gain complete control over the system. As OpenOffice does not receive regular security updates, such vulnerabilities often persist for a long time.
| Security gap | Discovery year | Risk potential | Status of rectification |
|---|---|---|---|
| Memory corruption gap | 2016 | High | No direct remedy |
| Directory traversal gap | 2021 | Critical | Still existing |
| Macro execution gap | 2019 | Medium | Partially fixed |
| XML parser vulnerability | 2018 | Medium to high | Incompletely fixed |
The ongoing security problems make OpenOffice an attractive target for Hacker attacks. These vulnerabilities pose a significant risk, particularly in corporate environments where sensitive data is processed. The lack of maintenance and the absence of regular security updates further exacerbate the situation.
Recommendations from LibreOffice
In view of the growing security concerns regarding OpenOffice, LibreOffice has provided specific recommendations for action. The developers of LibreOffice have clearly positioned themselves and advise users to switch to alternatives that are regularly updated. This recommendation is not based on competitive thinking, but on concern for theData securitythe user.
The LibreOffice developers accuse the Apache Software Foundation of creating the impression that OpenOffice is still being actively developed by making minimal changes such as adjustments to HTML tags and blank lines. According to LibreOffice, this practice harms the entire open source community as it lulls users into a false sense of security.
Security updates and patch management
A key difference between the two Office packages lies in the way they handle security updates. LibreOffice takes a proactive approach with regular updates that promptly close known security gaps. This is an essential component of effectiveSecurity measuresin the modern use of software.
A concrete example of this is the reaction to the directory traversal vulnerability. While LibreOffice responded immediately with versions 6.0.7 and 6.1.3, OpenOffice users remained unprotected. This different approach is reflected in the update frequency of both projects.
The developers of LibreOffice emphasize that regular updates not only bring new functions, but above all improve the user experience.Privacyimprove. Modern patch management is therefore essential for any software that is used in productive environments.
| Aspect | LibreOffice | OpenOffice |
|---|---|---|
| Update frequency | Every 1-2 months | Rarely (often years between releases) |
| Response time for security vulnerabilities | Usually within a few days | Indeterminate/delayed |
| Transparency in the event of security problems | Open communication | Limited information |
| Active developer community | Large and growing | Small and shrinking |
Best practices for data security
LibreOffice recommends several best practices to increase security when using Office software:
1.Regular updatesAlways install the latest version of the software to benefit from security patches.
2.Critical reviewQuestion whether software is still actively maintained before you use it for important documents.
3.Data encryptionUse the integrated encryption functions for sensitive documents.
4.Caution with macros: Only activate macros from trustworthy sources, as these are a gateway for Malware can be.
The LibreOffice developers criticize the fact that many technology portals continue to recommend OpenOffice, even though the software no longer meets current security standards. This leads to users unknowingly taking risks that could be avoided by switching to actively maintained software.
Particularly in companies and public authorities where sensitive data is processed, the choice of Office software should also be made underPrivacy-The decision must be made from a security point of view. Those responsible must weigh up whether the supposed stability of older software justifies the increased security risk.
In summary, LibreOffice recommends a holistic approach to software security that goes beyond mere functionality and focuses on the protection of user data. Regularly checking and updating the software used is one of the fundamentalSecurity measureswhich every user should observe.
The impact of security vulnerabilities
The use of software with known security vulnerabilities such as OpenOffice can have serious consequences for various user groups. While LibreOffice provides regular updates to close vulnerabilities, many security issues with OpenOffice remain unresolved. This situation creates a potential risk that should not be underestimated for both companies and private users.
In view of these developments, the LibreOffice team expressly recommends switching to alternatives and promotes its own office suite. The developers are particularly critical of the fact that many technology portals continue to recommend OpenOffice, even though the software no longer meets the latest standards. Safety standards corresponds.
Risks for company data
The consequences of security vulnerabilities in Office applications are particularly serious for companies. Confidential business data can be compromised by exploiting known vulnerabilities, which can result in direct financial losses.
In addition to the immediate financial damage, there is also the threat of long-term reputational damage. Customers and business partners lose trust if it becomes known that a company has been negligent with IT Security deals with.
The situation is particularly explosive in highly regulated industries. In the financial or healthcare sector, the use of software with known security vulnerabilities can violate compliance regulations and have legal consequences.
| Risk category | Impact for companies | Impact for private users | Preventive measures |
|---|---|---|---|
| Data loss | Loss of business-critical information, business interruption | Loss of personal documents and memories | Regular backups, cloud storage |
| Data theft | Industrial espionage, loss of trade secrets | Identity theft, financial fraud | Encryption, two-factor authentication |
| Malware infection | Network-wide compromise, ransomware attacks | Loss of system control, data extortion | Up-to-date anti-virus software, training of employees/users |
| Legal consequences | Fines for data protection violations, liability claims | Liability for the dissemination of Malware | Compliance with safety standards, up-to-date software |
Significance for end users
For private users, too, the Security risks considerable. Identity theft is one of the most common consequences when personal data falls into the wrong hands due to security breaches. The financial and emotional consequences can be devastating for those affected.
A particularly widespread attack scenario uses the exchange of Office documents by email. Attackers deliberately send prepared documents that execute malicious code when opened. This method is particularly insidious as it is based on users' trust in seemingly harmless file formats.
The danger is exacerbated by the fact that many users are unaware of the risks. If renowned technology portals continue to recommend software with known security vulnerabilities, this creates a false sense of security. Older or less tech-savvy users in particular are often unable to assess the technical background.
An effective strategy for IT Security should therefore include regular checks and updates of all software components used. This applies not only to operating systems and antivirus programs, but also to everyday applications such as office suites.
If you want to stay up to date with the latest security technology, you should regularly check whether your software is still being actively maintained. OpenOffice clearly shows that the long periods between updates can pose a considerable security risk.
Community feedback on security issues
Community feedback on the security issues surrounding OpenOffice reveals a growing gap between user expectations and the actual maintenance of the software. The ongoing problems have not only triggered technical discussions, but have also raised fundamental questions about trust in open source projects. It is particularly noteworthy that the OpenOffice website continues to give the impression of an actively maintained project, although the reality is different.
Voices of users and developers
Critical voices are piling up in numerous forums and social media about the Open source office software OpenOffice. One long-time user reports: "After ten years of loyal use, I had to switch to LibreOffice with a heavy heart. The lack of security updates in OpenOffice was simply no longer acceptable for my daily work."
Developers confirm these concerns from a technical perspective. "The OpenOffice code base contains known vulnerabilities that have not been fixed for years," explains a former contributor to the project. These statements coincide with LibreOffice's official warning about the Security risks when using OpenOffice.
As a result, there were serious discussions at Apache about whether the development of OpenOffice should be discontinued completely. These considerations reflect the gravity of the situation. Despite these internal debates, it has not yet been discontinued, which has caused many experts to shake their heads.
Effects on trust in OpenOffice
Trust in OpenOffice has been severely damaged by the ongoing security problems. Users are particularly critical of the fact that, despite the known risks, the official website continues to give the impression that it is a fully functional and secure product.
"It is misleading if new users come across the site and are not informed about the security concerns," comments an IT security expert. "More transparency regarding the implemented Security measures urgently needed."
The discussion also highlights a fundamental conflict in the open source world: while some argue that the community itself should take responsibility, others emphasize the duty of project maintainers to ensure basic security.
| Perspective | Main arguments | Proposed solutions | Confidence level |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active users | Lack of updates, lack of transparency | Switch to LibreOffice | Sharp drop |
| Developer | Outdated code base, unresolved security gaps | Complete realignment or end of project | Very low |
| IT administrators | Risks for company data, lack of patches | Migration to alternatives, training | Critically low |
| Occasional users | Insufficient information about risks | Better information, warnings | Decreasing |
This crisis of confidence has heightened awareness of the importance of security in open source projects as a whole. Many community members are now calling for stricter standards and more transparency in the communication of Security risks. The experience with OpenOffice could lead to a positive development in the entire open source landscape in the long term.
Tools for increasing safety
In order to Security risks when using OpenOffice, experts recommend the use of special protection tools and add-ons. Although these measures cannot guarantee complete protection, they do provide an important line of defense against potential threats. These tools are particularly important for users who, for various reasons, cannot immediately switch to more secure alternatives.
Recommended software for protection
As a basic protective measure against Malware the use of an up-to-date antivirus solution is essential. Programs with real-time scanning functions can identify suspicious documents before they cause damage. It is particularly important that virus signatures are updated regularly in order to be armed against the latest threats.
For users affected by the critical directory traversal vulnerability in OpenOffice, security expert Alex Inführ has developed a practical workaround. This consists of removing or renaming the "pythonscript.py" file, which is responsible for executing the script functionality.
Although this method disables the script functionality completely, it also prevents attackers from exploiting this vulnerability. The workaround is particularly suitable for environments in which the Python script functionality is not required.
Integration of add-ons and plugins
In addition to antivirus software, special add-ons and plug-ins can significantly improve the security of OpenOffice. These extensions act as additional Security measures and offer protection functions that go beyond the standard settings.
We particularly recommend add-ons that:
- Control and restrict the execution of macros
- Monitor access to external resources
- Block suspicious activities in real time
- Analyze documents in a sandbox before opening them
When installing add-ons, however, care should be taken to ensure that they come from trustworthy sources. Dubious add-ons can themselves become a security risk and introduce additional vulnerabilities.
It is important to understand that all these tools and measures should only serve as temporary solutions. They can reduce the risk, but do not offer complete protection against all security threats. The safest option remains to switch to an actively maintained alternative such as LibreOffice, which receives regular security updates.
Alternatives to OpenOffice
If you want to switch from OpenOffice due to the security vulnerabilities, there are a number of powerful alternatives on the market today. The ongoing security concerns and slow response to critical issues make a switch inevitable for many users. Fortunately, there are numerous options available from both open source and commercial providers that offer better protection and regular updates.
Other open source office suites
The most obvious alternative to OpenOffice is undoubtedly LibreOffice. As a direct successor, it shares the same code base, but is actively developed further and receives regular security updates. The changeover is generally straightforward, as both programs have similar user interfaces and work with the same file formats.
A major advantage of LibreOffice is its active developer community, which reacts quickly to security problems. While OpenOffice often does not release updates for critical security vulnerabilities for months, LibreOffice usually closes such vulnerabilities within a few days or weeks.
In addition to LibreOffice, there are other notable open source alternatives:
- Calligra Suite - A comprehensive office suite with unique functions for creative work
- OnlyOffice - Modern user interface with excellent Microsoft Office compatibility
- WPS Office - Offers a free version with good compatibility with Microsoft formats
- SoftMaker FreeOffice - Lean alternative with high speed and good format compatibility
All of the open source solutions mentioned offer the advantage of regular Software updatesThis ensures that security gaps are closed promptly. This is a decisive factor for data security in daily use.
Comparison with commercial solutions
Those who are prepared to pay for additional functions and support will find powerful alternatives in the commercial sector. Microsoft Office remains the market leader with comprehensive functions and regular security updates. With Microsoft 365, the company also offers a subscription model with cloud integration and continuous updates.
Google Workspace (formerly G Suite) is another popular option that is particularly suitable for collaborative working. The web-based solution requires no manual updates and offers integrated security functions.
The following table provides an overview of the most important features of various Office alternatives:
| Office suite | Costs | Update frequency | Compatibility | Special features |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LibreOffice | Free of charge | Very regular | Good | Direct alternative to OpenOffice |
| OnlyOffice | Free of charge/premium | Regularly | Very good | Modern interface, cloud integration |
| Microsoft 365 | Chargeable | Monthly | Outstanding | Industry standard, comprehensive support |
| Google Workspace | Chargeable | Automatic | Good | Optimized for collaboration, web-based |
| SoftMaker Office | Free of charge/premium | Regularly | Very good | Saving resources, fast |
When choosing an alternative, users should consider not only security but also compatibility with existing documents, user-friendliness and specific functional requirements. For most OpenOffice users, LibreOffice is the easiest switch, as the user interface and functions are very similar.
Regardless of the alternative chosen, it is crucial to ensure regular Software updates to pay attention to. These not only close security gaps, but often also bring new functions and improvements. Particularly in a business environment, the security of the Open source office software be checked regularly.
Future outlook: Security strategies
In the constantly evolving software landscape, clear trends are emerging for future security strategies. The current challenges with OpenOffice are just one example of the growing importance of robust IT security concepts. At a time when Hacker attacks As security systems become more sophisticated, defenses and security philosophies must also make an evolutionary leap.
The threat landscape is becoming increasingly complex, which requires new approaches in software development and in the management of open source projects. A rethink is particularly necessary for programs that work with sensitive data on a daily basis, such as Office applications.
Trends in software development
The future of software development will be significantly shaped by the principle of "security by design". This approach integrates IT Security into the development process right from the start, instead of treating them as an afterthought. Developers must consider security aspects as early as the design phase.
Automated security tests are becoming standard. Modern development environments are increasingly integrating tools that continuously search for vulnerabilities and issue warnings before code is released into production environments.
Another important trend is the increased use of threat modeling. This involves systematically identifying and evaluating potential threats in order to develop targeted protective measures. This proactive approach is increasingly replacing reactive patching following the discovery of security vulnerabilities.
| Aspect | Traditional approach | Future-oriented approach | Advantages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safety philosophy | Reactive (patching after discovery) | Proactive (security by design) | Fewer security incidents, lower costs |
| Test procedure | Manual safety tests | Automated continuous tests | Early detection of weak points |
| Responsibility | Specialized security team | Shared responsibility of all developers | Broader safety awareness |
| Transparency | Limited disclosure | Complete transparency for security issues | Higher user confidence |
Role of open source communities
The role of open source communities will change significantly in the coming years. While the model of voluntary contributions will continue to form the foundation Sustainable governance structures increasingly important. Clear responsibilities for security issues and transparent decision-making processes are becoming decisive success factors.
Despite its current problems, OpenOffice has made a significant contribution to digital sovereignty. The spread of the Open Document Format (ODF) as an open source file format for office applications is a lasting legacy. This format was standardized by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) in 2006 and is increasingly being used by government agencies and authorities.
In the future, it is becoming apparent that successful open source projects will not only have to establish their security processes, but also actively communicate them. Transparency in dealing with security vulnerabilities will become a competitive advantage. Users will increasingly ask for comprehensible security concepts before deciding on software.
Another development concerns the financing of security audits. While commercial software is regularly audited by external experts, open source projects often lack the funds to do so. New models for the joint financing of security audits are emerging here, for example through foundations or corporate cooperations.
The defense of Hacker attacks will be more strongly characterized by cross-community collaboration in the future. The exchange of information on threats and best practices between different projects will become increasingly important. This collective intelligence could become a decisive advantage over proprietary software.
Conclusion on the use of LibreOffice and OpenOffice
In the area of conflict between functionality and security, a comparison of LibreOffice and OpenOffice reveals clear differences with far-reaching consequences. Although both programs share a common code base and offer similar functions, the fundamental difference lies in the way they deal with Security gaps. While LibreOffice is continuously improved and secured by its active developer community, OpenOffice remains outdated in many areas - with all the associated risks.
Conclusions on the choice of software
The choice between LibreOffice and OpenOffice should be made primarily from a security perspective. LibreOffice offers security through regular updates and fast reactions to discovered vulnerabilities. Security gaps significantly better protection for sensitive data. These security benefits far outweigh the minor differences in the user interface.
In Germany, the IT Planning Council underlines the importance of open standards with its plan to introduce the Open Document Format (ODF) as the standard for document exchange in public administration by 2027. This format is supported by both Office suites, but the benefits of open standards can only be fully exploited with a secure implementation.
"Using software with known, unpatched security vulnerabilities is negligent in times of increasing cyber threats - especially when secure alternatives are available free of charge."
For private users, opting for LibreOffice not only means more security, but also access to newer functions and better compatibility with modern document formats. Thanks to the similar user interface, switching to LibreOffice is generally easy and requires hardly any training.
Recommendations for managers in companies
For IT managers in companies, the security analysis results in clear recommendations for action. Existing OpenOffice installations should be replaced promptly with LibreOffice or other actively maintained alternatives. The migration process should be systematically planned in order to minimize interruptions in the workflow.
The following criteria should be taken into account when evaluating Office software:
- Timeliness of security updates and patch management
- Size and activity of the developer community
- Compatibility with existing systems and documents
- Compliance with Privacy-Requirements
- Long-term sustainability of the software
Particularly in industries with high demands on the Privacy and information security is the use of software with known unpatched vulnerabilities. Security gaps not justifiable. The investment in training and the switch to LibreOffice quickly pays for itself by avoiding security incidents.
Companies should also establish a clear policy for handling and exchanging documents. The use of open standard formats such as ODF not only promotes interoperability, but also reduces dependency on individual software providers - an important aspect for the long-term IT strategy.
The decision to use LibreOffice is ultimately an investment in the future viability of your own IT infrastructure and the protection of valuable company data from increasing cyber threats.
Frequently asked questions (FAQ)
In view of the security concerns surrounding OpenOffice, questions often arise which we will answer below. Many users are unsettled and are looking for concrete recommendations for action. In particular, the topics of switching and current sources of information take center stage.
What to do with OpenOffice installations already in use?
If you already use OpenOffice, security experts recommend switching to a more secure alternative such as LibreOffice as soon as possible. The known Vulnerabilities make further use increasingly risky for your data and systems.
If an immediate changeover is not possible, you should at least take the following temporary protective measures:
- Deactivate the script functionality by removing or renaming the pythonscript.py file
- Do not open any documents from unknown or untrusted sources
- Always keep your antivirus software up to date
- Deactivate macros in the security settings
Please note that these measures only offer temporary protection and are not a complete replacement for a secure Office program. LibreOffice, for example, has already released updates for the directory traversal vulnerability. Versions 6.0.7 and 6.1.3 are no longer vulnerable to this vulnerability. Security risks.
Where can I find the latest safety information?
In order to always be Vulnerabilities and Security risks to stay informed, you can use various reliable sources:
- The official LibreOffice website offers regularly updated security information at libreoffice.org/about-us/security/
- The Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT) publishes warnings about critical security vulnerabilities
- The Federal Office for Information Security (BSI) provides information on current threats
- Trade journals such as c't, iX or Heise Security report promptly on newly discovered vulnerabilities
It is advisable for LibreOffice users to activate the automatic update function. This means you will receive important security updates without delay. Linux users should also regularly install the relevant updates for their distribution.
If you are unsure, you can also turn to the active community forums. There you will often find helpful tips from experienced users and developers who can assist you in solving security problems.
"The biggest security gap is often in front of the screen. Regular updates and a healthy skepticism towards unknown files are the best protection."
Remember that security is a continuous process. Even when using the latest software, you should always remain vigilant and follow basic security practices.
Concluding remarks
The discussion about security vulnerabilities in Office programs shows how important it is to be vigilant when using digital tools. Users should not only pay attention to the functionality, but also to the security aspect of their software.
Important resources and links for users
For anyone who wants to secure their Office applications, the official LibreOffice website (libreoffice.org) offers downloads as well as comprehensive security information. The German Federal Office for Information Security provides valuable tips in its guide "Secure configuration of LibreOffice".
Regular visits to the security pages of the software used help to stay informed about new threats. For companies, special training courses on the topic of IT Security a sensible investment.
Call to raise awareness of IT security
The danger from Hacker attacks is growing every day. Office programs are a particular focus, as they are installed on almost every computer and are used on a daily basis. A healthy distrust and regular updates are the best protection.
Every user is responsible for their own IT Security. This means finding out which software is still actively maintained and which is not. The decision between LibreOffice and OpenOffice is more than just a question of functions - it can be decisive for the protection of personal data.
Ultimately, a well-maintained open source solution often offers more security than outdated software with known vulnerabilities. This realization should be at the heart of every software decision.
English 
Deutsch 
Español 
Français 
Polski